Showing posts with label Leadership. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Leadership. Show all posts

Monday, March 18, 2013

Roles vs Titles

Curtis Guilbot has a great post that describes the top roles in a business organization. These roles are different than titles. Check it out.

I discuss roles vs. titles in Change Agent: Visions. This is a good example of what I mean.

Next post: Thoughts about South by Southwest.


Friday, February 8, 2013

5 Characteristics of Weak Leaders (and How Not to Be One)

Micheal Hyatt's Intentional Leadership Blog is a though-provoking series of posts on leadership.  This particular post is one that I wish I had written myself.

Here are 5 characteristics that any leader or future leader should mindfully eliminate.

If there is a sixth point, it would be a failure to understand when you are in over your head and therefore failing to seek help. My favorite Aunt calls this leadership failure "being a dummy". Ego can make even very smart people dummies.

Friday, January 25, 2013

What are the characteristics of a Change Agent?


A Change Agent is someone that thrives in the current environment of massive change. He or she does that with a vehicle that harnesses the power of that change when the change's flow is favorable. The Change Agent also has the tools to help recognize when to temporarily seek shelter from unfavorable changes. Most important, a Change Agent understands that absolute stability is an illusion.

I have spent most of the last year working on the concept of “Become a Change Agent”, drawing on my experience in the workplace. I am writing a Kindle miniseries on the subject. More about Parts One and Two at the end of this post. I was not always a Change Agent. I tried to cling to the “UsedToBes” in my business and it caused me to work harder and harder for a shrinking return. I did not learn to embrace change until I was well into my second career in Information Technology.
There are several characteristics that make anyone a Change Agent:

1.       A Change Agent holds Vision.  It is important to have and be mindful of a Vision. You need a Vision to know where you are going. Change Agents review thier Vision constantly to make sure that actions are consistent with the Vision.

2.      A Change Agent knows about change and harnesses its power. The title of Part One in my “Become a Change Agent” series is “Understanding Change. A Change Agent stays in the flow of change to amplify his or her effort. You must be able to understand the flow before you can harness it.

3.      A Change Agent is resilient. That mean he or she has the ability to persist, recover or thrive amid disruption. So do the groups that the Change Agent influence.

4.      A Change Agent inspires others, primarily by sharing an infectious Vision and expressing the appropriate amount of gratitude.

5.      A Change Agent leads by doing and example. The Change Agent does NOT sit in the corner office and bark orders!

6.      A Change Agent is able to humbly assume the role of resourceful follower when the situation arises.

7.      A Change Agent co-creates. Creative collaborations with others create strong interpersonal bonds. Unity is a powerful force for positive change!

8.     A Change Agent knows that adaptability is the new wealth. Change Agents constantly seek and choose options because they know nothing is permanent – good or bad. The ability and willingness to adapt conquers fear.

9.      A Change Agent produces more than he/she consumes. This is a cornerstone of personal responsibility. It is also the only way to ensure long-term sustainability of your customer base.

Here is a link to PartOne of my Kindle miniseries. Part Two is Now available. If you sign up for the mailing list, you will get an opportunity to download Part Two for free in early May!







Are you a Change Agent?http://amzn.to/VtNhV4

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Multitasking versus focus and mindfulness



Multitasking is in many ways the opposite of focus and mindfulness. The ability to multitask has always been assumed (i.e. the ability to walk and chew gum) but it is seemingly REQUIRED in today’s workplace. It is severely overrated and it is the cause a lot of the dysfunction that is obvious without even thinking in “Dilbert mode”. Focusing with laser-like intensity is the way to accomplish the most in the least amount of time.


 

I once worked in a place where you were considered “out of date” if you did not take a laptop into a meeting. What I quickly discovered is that most of the meetings were unimportant. (Holding relevant meetings is a topic for another time.) The actual multitaskers inevitably wasted everyone else’s time with “I missed that, could you repeat?” Again, the subtle message was that the work being done on the laptop (and frequently, it was FaceBooking) was more important than the meeting.

Here are some important points to keep in mind about multitasking:

·         You are not a computer. The circuitry and code of a CPU is designed to rapidly change focus from one job/task to another.  The human brain is not. We must go through the process of finding our place with each switch of focus. This is actually time consuming (which means you can get more done by focusing on tasks one at a time).

·         Benefits of focus in problem solving. Focus allows us to do a better job of sorting out the facts. It might even seem like a focused individual is not doing anything during a very intense session of “figuring things out”.  In reality, they are channeling their inner Sherlock Holmes.  Maria Konnikova has just published an excellent book on the subject of thinking like the famous fictional detective.

·       If a face to face conversation is one of the tasks, doing anything else during the talk is a subliminal message that the other issue (IM, phone, filing papers) is more important than the other person in that conversation. Choose to be present. Choose to tell the other person that you value the fact they made the effort to show up “live and in person”.

·         Increased Stress. Constant, long term multitasking can overstimulate your “fight or flight” responses. This causes several hormones, cortisol, noradrenaline and adrenaline. The stress to your system of these “false fight or flight” responses is bad and there are all sorts of associated health risks that come with prolonged stress.

·         Exceptions that make sense. Simple tasks can be combined, especially if one of the tasks is waiting. A good example is filing while you wait on hold. You know exactly what the next filing task is, so there is no significant effort in finding your place.

Do you remember when multitasking made you mess something up or when focus allowed you to succeed?

Sunday, November 4, 2012

Introduction to Leadership

 Part One of Become a Change Agent: ended by describing vision as the cornerstone of your leadership. Part Two dives straight into the nature of a vision because you can’t lead without an idea of where you are going! This series of blog posts will act as the bridge between Parts One and Two.

Chapter 3 even lists the negative trends that we readily see in today’s institutions and the “leaders” that manage them. Now is the time to ask…

What is a leader?

A leader organizes and directs people in a common direction. It may be toward a goal or a series of goals. Leaders and Managers are different; even though there is some overlap for managers of people. It is possible to manage a process, a service or inventory. You can only lead people. Managers have titles, budgets and infrastructure. Their authority is granted from a higher authority. Leaders have followers and their authority stems from their actions and skills. Leaders have roles.

Leaders lead from the front. They are doers, not managers. Those that follow them know they pull their weight and give more because they can see what the leader is doing – not cowering in a corner office. True leaders embrace their followers as equals. They celebrate the accomplishments of those they lead and freely give away credit.

Two critical components of leadership are transparency and the ability to present a coherent message. The leader’s vision may be huge and complicated. Presenting the parts in “digestible” pieces is key. At the same time, the pieces must both make sense and fit together in an easy to understand and follow format. This is the message or the vision in an easy to communicate form.

Transparency means that people know what a leader is doing. There are 2 levels of transparency, internal and external. External transparency is communicating concrete and verifiable facts that indicate the leader and organization are playing by the rules and executing on their plan/vision.  This must be balanced against the needs to protect the confidences that have been entrusted to the leader. Leaders cannot openly talk about the organization’s “special sauce” – the special knowledge that makes the group’s deliverables unique.

Yet another aspect of transparency is a leader that openly owns his/her own mistakes. This has the added value of helping the group avoid repeating that mistake!


 
Leaders must vigilantly guard against falling into the ego trap. True leaders are constantly complemented because they are effective. Flattery can be addictive to the ego. The best way I know to preserve humility is to understand where the ego fits in the self. (A description of this is found at the end of my report on Models. You can get a free copy by subscribing to my mailing list.)

 True leaders lead with passion and love. Passion is an intensely positive attitude toward the leader’s vision and goals. Love is the genuine affection the leader feels for his followers. Leaders that fake either of these traits will be exposed in the long run!

Is there more than one kind of leader?


The short answer is yes, there are several kinds of leaders. Here are a few of the important types of leadership.

Business leaders lead organizations that produce goods and services for a profit. The leader may be over a small business or a specific unit of a large business. Large organizations tend to be run by professional Managers that don’t necessarily fit the description of leadership listed here.

Non-profit organizations are also run by leaders. These organizations tend to provide services that cannot be expected to earn a profit as defined by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. They must operate by a specific set of rules to qualify as non-profit organizations.

Community and political leaders tend to have common goals. They organize for the good of a specifically defined group such as the citizens of a city or a defined interest group. Their primary concern is the well-being of the people they both lead and serve.

Thought leaders strive to be at the cutting edge of new ideas. They both observe and create new methods and technologies. Thought leaders are recognized for innovation by their peers, typically in a specialized business environment. Most people additionally consider thought leaders as mentors that deliver value to customers in the form of innovative ideas.

Want more about Leadership?


Kevin W. McCarthy has written a couple of great books on the subject. He takes the subject of both personal and team leadership on in much more detail than I do.

What is coming in the next post in this Leadership Series?


The next post deals with visionaries and why they never go out of style.

 

Friday, September 14, 2012

Case Study: Peter Diamandis

This is a case study of Dr. Peter Diamandis. I first came into contact with him as a supporter of the X-Prize (and I thought it was a HUGE, out of this world idea). Little did I know that this was a mere middle chapter in the life of this remarkable visionary.

Let’s examine his career using the principles of Becoming a Change Agent. The first thing to examine is his vision:

Humans should be a multiplanetary species. That is big and it is contagious. It is a clear statement of intention. It is a vision for his life as well as the planet!

The next step is to analyze his work in light of the Framework.

1.       Set Sail

By 1980 it was obvious the government’s approach to space exploration was too timid for the Diamandis vision. In fact, the United States’ last maned flight had taken place in 1976. As a college student, he created Students for the Exploration and Development of Space. 35 people showed up for the first meeting and it continues to spread.

In 1987 he and two colleagues founded the International Space University. It grew from a graduate-level summer program to have a permanent campus and 3,300 graduates today.

2.       Now – Waiting on government sponsored programs is waiting forever.  

Diamondis realized this in 1992 when the Administration made empty promises to return to the moon and Mars.

3.       The path to activating the vision and

4.       Taking steps along the way

Two things have always driven exploration, resources and tourism. So He took steps to leverage those activities into a human presence in space:
·         1992- Founds Zero Gravity, a for profit business that allows customers to experience weightlessness on parabolic airplane flights. Steven Hawking is his most famous customer.

·         1996- Announces the X-Prize, borrowing the idea of a contest in the same way that the Ortieg prize (won by Charles Lindbergh) jump-started the aviation industry.

·         2001-Space Adventures (a company he founded in 1998) arranges for Dennis Tito to visit the International Space Station

·         2004-Awards the $10 million Ansari X-Prize to Mojave Aerospace Ventures, who successfully completed the contest in their spacecraft SpaceShipOne. A total of $100 million was spent by 26 teams competing for the prize.

·         2005-Expands the X-Prize foundation to spur breakthrough work in other areas such as clean energy, education and health care

·         2008-Founds Singularity University, an intensive 10-week program in which students and faculty study emerging technologies to address “Humanity’s grand challenges”. To date, 24 companies have been spun off from these studies.

5. How do you read the map?

He wrote an alternative to Murphy’s Law called “Peter’s Laws” – If anything can go wrong, fix it. “No” means begin again one level higher. Do it by the book but be the author.

He has observed that small teams can accomplish amazing things with world-changing technology. The world’s biggest challenges are also the biggest market opportunities.

An era of unprecedented abundance is arriving. Today, a Maasai tribesman in Kenya has better mobile communications than President Reagan had in the White House. If it is a smart phone, it is better than President Clinton had. Their Google is exactly the same as Larry Page’s (a key executive at Google).

The key risk is risk aversion. There are no breakthroughs without risk. Society has moved from a stance of it is OK unless it is specifically illegal to it is wrong unless it is specifically permitted.

6. Keep it going

This year, Dr. Diamandis founded Planetary Resources, an asteroid mining company with backing from Larry Page, James Cameron and Ross Perot. The priority for the next 2-5 years is finding targets. The goal is to land robotic mining equipment on an asteroid in a little over 10 years.